Reference values for echocardiographic assessment of the diameter of the aortic root and ascending aorta spanning all age categories. Academic Article uri icon


MeSH Major

  • Aging
  • Aneurysm, Dissecting
  • Aorta, Thoracic
  • Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic
  • Echocardiography, Doppler, Color
  • Nomograms


  • Thoracic aortic dilatation requires accurate and timely detection to prevent progression to thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection. The detection of thoracic aortic dilatation necessitates the availability of cut-off values for normal aortic diameters. Tools to evaluate aortic dimension above the root are scarce and inconsistent regarding age groups. The aim of this study was to provide reference values for aortic root and ascending aortic diameters on the basis of transthoracic echocardiographic measurements in a large cohort of children and adults. Diameters at the level of the sinuses of Valsalva (SoV) and ascending aorta (AA) were assessed with transthoracic echocardiography in 849 subjects (453 females, age range 1 to 85 years, mean 40.1 ± 21.3 years) and measured according to published guidelines. Linear regression analysis was applied to create nomograms, as well as equations for upper limits of normal and z-scores. SoV and AA diameters were strongly correlated with age, body surface area (BSA), and weight (r = 0.67 to 0.79, p <0.001 for all). Male subjects had significantly larger aortic dimensions at all levels in adulthood, even after BSA correction (p ≤0.004 for all age intervals). Gender-, age-, and BSA-specific upper limits of normal and z-score equations were developed from a multivariate regression model, which strongly predicts SoV and AA diameters (adjusted R(2) for SoV = 0.84 and 0.67 and for AA = 0.82 and 0.74, for male and female subjects, respectively). In conclusion, this study provides widely applicable reference values for thoracic aortic dilatation screening purposes. Age, BSA, and gender must be taken into account when assessing an individual patient.

publication date

  • January 2014



  • Academic Article



  • eng

PubMed ID

  • 25092193

Additional Document Info

start page

  • 914

end page

  • 20


  • 114


  • 6