Do in-kind benefits influence pharmacists' labor supply decisions? Academic Article uri icon


MeSH Major

  • Methadone
  • Opiate Substitution Treatment
  • Opioid-Related Disorders


  • This paper explores whether in-kind benefits influence the labor supply decisions of pharmacists. Particular attention is paid to decisions to supply more than thirty hours of labor per week, when in-kind benefits are usually standard. A distinction is also made between pharmacists in managerial and/or ownership positions and those in traditional staff positions. Using survey data from registered pharmacists in North Dakota, we find that the labor supply determinants for owners/managers and employees are significantly different. We also find that while in-kind benefits do not appear to influence the typical staff pharmacist's decision of how many hours to work each week, certain, but not all, types of these benefits do influence the decision of the representative owner/manager. Furthermore, the determinants of hours worked, in general, do not differ across the thirty hour per week threshold. © 2011 MCRSA. All rights reserved.

publication date

  • October 20, 2011



  • Academic Article

Additional Document Info

start page

  • 33

end page

  • 52


  • 41


  • 1