No difference in patient reported outcomes between cohorts undergoing lesion-specific surgery for osteochondritis dissecans of the knee.
Academic Article
Overview
abstract
INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of data on patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) associated with surgical treatment of osteochondritis dissecans (OCD). As a result, preoperative patient and family counseling regarding expected outcomes is difficult. The purpose of this study was to compare pre-to post-operative changes in PROMs amongst cohorts of patients with OCD that underwent one of three lesion-specific surgical treatments: 1) transarticular drilling for stable lesions, 2) drilling and fixation for unstable lesions 3) grafting for unsalvageable lesions. METHODS: The electronic medical records of pediatric and adolescent patients with knee OCD, at a single institution between January 2017 and August 2019, were reviewed. Patients were categorized into one of three surgical groups, with initial determination confirmed at the time of surgery during diagnostic knee arthroscopy. Differences between groups were assessed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: Of the 78 patients included in this study, 49 (62.8%) were male with a mean age of 13.5 ± 2.2 years. There was no significant difference between the surgical groups for baseline HSS Pedi-FABS (P = 0.58) or PROMIS Mobility (P = 0.47). There were no significant differences in PROMIS PI scores at baseline (P = 0.32), at latest follow-up (P = 0.72), or in interval change from baseline to follow-up (P = 0.42), between the three surgical groups. CONCLUSION: Lesion-specific surgical management of OCD led to similar improvements in PROMIS PI at a minimum of one-year follow-up. These results may better allow surgeons to reassure patients and families that outcomes are similar when lesions are treated through a lesion-specific algorithm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV: Retrospective cohort study.
