Impact of Pediatric Orthopaedic Fellowship Training on Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fracture Treatment and Outcomes: A Meta-analysis.
Review
Overview
abstract
BACKGROUND: Supracondylar humerus (SCH) fractures are common pediatric injuries, typically requiring closed reduction and percutaneous pinning or open reduction. These injuries are managed frequently by both pediatric-trained (PTOS) and nonpediatric-trained (NTOS) orthopaedic surgeons. However, some literature suggests that complications for pediatric injuries are lower when managed by PTOS. Therefore, this meta-analysis sought to compile existing literature comparing patients treated by PTOS and NTOS to better understand differences in management and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Using preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) methodology, a systematic review was conducted for all articles comparing SCH fractures managed by PTOS and NTOS in 4 online databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane). Study quality was assessed through the use of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analyses were then performed for postoperative outcomes using pooled data from the included studies. Statistics were reported as odds ratios and 95% CI. RESULTS: This search strategy yielded 242 unique titles, of which 12 underwent full-text review and 7 met final inclusion. All studies were retrospective and evaluated patients treated in the United States. There were a total of 692 and 769 patients treated by PTOS and NTOS, respectively. PTOS had shorter operative times [mean difference, 13.6 min (CI, -23.9 to -3.4), P=0.01] and less frequently utilized a medial-entry pin [odds ratios, 0.36 (CI, 0.2 to 0.9), P=0.03]. There were no differences in time to treatment, the necessity of open reduction, postoperative Baumann angle, or complications including surgical site infection or iatrogenic nerve injury. CONCLUSIONS: Despite shorter operative times and lower frequency of cross-pinning when treated by PTOS, pediatric SCH fracture outcomes are similar when treated by PTOS and NTOS. These findings demonstrate that these fractures may possibly be treated safely by both PTOS and experienced fellowship-trained academic NTOS who are comfortable managing these injuries in pediatric patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III; Meta-analysis.
