Discrimination Ability of Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Pediatric Domains Compared With Scoliosis Research Society-22r and Legacy Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Juvenile and Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.
Academic Article
Overview
abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Comparative cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To compare patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in children and adolescents with varying extent of spinal deformity. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several PROMs have been proposed to help assess health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) in pediatric spinal deformity surgery and research, but it is unclear which are sensitive to deformity severity. METHODS: Pediatric patients diagnosed with spinal asymmetry or juvenile/adolescent idiopathic scoliosis completed the patient-reported outcomes management information system (PROMIS) pediatric computer adaptive test bank (Domains: Mobility, Pain Interference, Physical Activity, Physical Stress Experiences, Psychological Stress Experiences), Scoliosis Research Society-22r (SRS-22r), Hospital for Special Surgery Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale (HSS Pedi-FABS) activity scale, and Trunk Appearance Perception Scale. Patients were grouped as spinal asymmetry, mild deformity, and substantial deformity by major Cobb angle measuring less than 10°, between 10° and 40°, and greater than 40° respectively. One-way analysis of variance with a Tukey post-hoc correction was used to determine score differences between groups. RESULTS: Final analyses included 206 patients, of which 135 (66%) were female. The mean age was 13.0 ± 2.2 years, and the mean major Cobb angle was 20.1 ± 14.1° (range: 0-74.2°). Compared with both spinal asymmetry and mild deformity patients, patients with substantial deformity reported worse outcomes, including lower function, more pain, and decreased psychological health by legacy PROMs and PROMIS. PROMIS Physical Activity and Psychological Stress Experiences did not capture any significant differences between all groups. There were no significant differences in outcomes between the spinal asymmetry and mild deformity groups for all PROMs measured. CONCLUSION: Patients with substantial spinal deformity reported lower activity and function, more pain, and greater physical and psychological stress compared with patients without clinical spinal deformity by legacy PROMs and several PROMIS domains. As PROMIS Physical Activity and Psychological Stress Experiences did not capture these differences, these PROMs may measure different constructs than the legacy PROMs as they relate to spinal curvature and may be less relevant to measure HRQoL in this population.Level of Evidence 3.
