Comparison of Effectiveness of Alcohol Septal Ablation Versus Ventricular Septal Myectomy on Acute Care Use for Cardiovascular Disease in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.
Academic Article
Overview
abstract
Alcohol septal ablation (ASA) and ventricular septal myectomy (VSM) are 2 options of ventricular septal reduction therapy (VSRT) for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC). We hypothesized that patients with HC who underwent ASA have a higher risk of acute care use (i.e., emergency department [ED] visit or unplanned hospitalization) for cardiovascular disease (CVD) than VSM. We performed a comparative effectiveness study of ASA versus VSM (reference group) among patients with HC who underwent VSRT, using population-based ED and inpatient databases in 3 states, 2005 to 2014. The outcome was acute care use for CVD during a 2-year post-VSRT period. We constructed univariable and multivariable logistic regression models to compare the risk during sequential 6-month periods. We also performed sensitivity analysis with propensity score-matching at 1:1 ratio. We identified 850 patients with HC who underwent VSRT, including 393 with ASA and 457 with VSM. During 13 to 18 months after VSRT, there was a nonsignificantly higher risk with ASA than VSM (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83 to 3.60; p = 0.14). Patients who had ASA had a significantly higher risk in the 19 to 24 months post-VSRT period (adjusted OR 2.12; 95% CI 1.06 to 4.23; p = 0.03). Similarly, the propensity score-matched analysis demonstrated a higher risk with ASA than VSM during 13 to 18 months (OR 2.97; 95% CI 1.04 to 8.46; p = 0.04) and 19 to 24 months (OR 7.06; 95% CI 2.04 to 24.36; p = 0.002) after VSRT. In conclusion, among 850 patients with HC who underwent VSRT, the risk of acute care use for CVD was higher after ASA than VSM during the second post-VSRT year.
