Molecular Analysis of Resistance and Detection of Non-Wild-Type Strains Using Etest Epidemiological Cutoff Values for Amphotericin B and Echinocandins for Bloodstream Candida Infections from a Tertiary Hospital in Qatar. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • A total of 301 Candida bloodstream isolates collected from 289 patients over 5 years at a tertiary hospital in Qatar were evaluated. Out of all Candida infections, 53% were diagnosed in patients admitted to the intensive care units. Steady increases in non-albicans Candida species were reported from 2009 to 2014 (30.2% for Candida albicans versus 69.8% for the other Candida species). Etest antifungal susceptibility testing was performed on all recovered clinical isolates to determine echinocandin (micafungin and anidulafungin) and amphotericin B susceptibilities and assess non-wild-type (non-WT) strains (strains for which MICs were above the epidemiological cutoff values). DNA sequence analysis was performed on all isolates to assess the presence of FKS mutations, which confer echinocandin resistance in Candida species. A total of 3.9% of isolates (12/301) among strains of C. albicans and C. orthopsilosis contained FKS hot spot mutations, including heterozygous mutations in FKS1 For C. tropicalis, the Etest appeared to overestimate strains non-WT for micafungin, anidulafungin, and amphotericin B, as 14%, 11%, and 35% of strains, respectively, had values above the epidemiological cutoff value. However, no FKS mutations were identified in this species. For all other species, micafungin best reported the echinocandin non-WT strains relative to the FKS genotype, as anidulafungin tended to overestimate non-wild-type strains. Besides C. tropicalis, few strains were classified as non-WT for amphotericin B.

publication date

  • August 27, 2018

Research

keywords

  • Amphotericin B
  • Antifungal Agents
  • Candida
  • Candidemia
  • Candidiasis
  • Drug Resistance, Fungal
  • Echinocandins

Identity

PubMed Central ID

  • PMC6125493

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 85052195752

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1128/AAC.00214-18

PubMed ID

  • 29941644

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 62

issue

  • 9