Hamstring Autograft for Foot and Ankle Applications. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • BACKGROUND: Hamstring tendon autografts may be used for foot and ankle surgeries, although reports on their effectiveness and morbidity in the foot and ankle literature are limited. We studied a cohort of patients who underwent hamstring harvest for foot and ankle applications, hypothesizing that morbidity to the knee would be limited. METHODS: We studied a cohort of patients who underwent hamstring autograft for foot or ankle applications by a fellowship-trained sports and foot and ankle surgeon since 2011. Thirty-seven patients underwent isokinetic strength testing using a dynamometer an average of 38 months postoperatively. The average patient age was 45 ± 16 (range, 18-78) years, and 54% were women. Peak flexion and extension torque as well as flexion and extension torque at 30, 70, and 90 degrees of flexion were collected at 2 different testing speeds, 180 and 300 degrees/s. t tests were used for all comparisons. RESULTS: At follow-up, 32 patients (86%) reported no pain at the harvest site; the remaining 5 patients reported mild to moderate symptoms. No patients were dissatisfied, and all would recommend the surgery to someone else. Flexion strength at higher degrees of flexion was significantly lower compared with extension strength as well as compared with flexion strength at lower degrees of flexion, when testing was performed at lower speed ( P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: When used for foot and ankle surgery, hamstring autografts resulted in high patient satisfaction with minimal donor site morbidity. While knee flexion strength was decreased at higher degrees of flexion, this finding did not appear to be clinically significant. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

publication date

  • November 24, 2017

Research

keywords

  • Ankle Joint
  • Autografts
  • Hamstring Muscles
  • Hamstring Tendons
  • Knee Joint

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 85041555850

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1177/1071100717738220

PubMed ID

  • 29171284

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 39

issue

  • 2