Biomechanical Analysis of Suture Anchor vs Tenodesis Screw for FHL Transfer. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • BACKGROUND: Chronic Achilles injury is often treated with flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendon transfer to the calcaneus using 1 or 2 incisions. A single incision avoids the risks of extended dissections yet yields smaller grafts, which may limit fixation options. We investigated the required length of FHL autograft and biomechanical profiles for suture anchor and biotenodesis screw fixation. METHODS: Single-incision FHL transfer with suture anchor or biotenodesis screw fixation to the calcaneus was performed on 20 fresh cadaveric specimens. Specimens were cyclically loaded until maximal load to failure. Length of FHL tendon harvest, ultimate load, stiffness, and mode of failure were recorded. RESULTS: Tendon harvest length needed for suture anchor fixation was 16.8 ± 2.1 mm vs 29.6 ± 2.4 mm for biotenodesis screw ( P = .002). Ultimate load to failure was not significantly different between groups. A significant inverse correlation existed between failure load and donor age when all specimens were pooled (ρ = -0.49, P < .05). Screws in younger specimens (fewer than 70) resulted in significantly greater failure loads ( P < .03). No difference in stiffness was found between groups. Modes of failure for screw fixation were either tunnel pullout (n = 6) or tendon rupture (n = 4). Anchor failure occurred mostly by suture breakage (n = 8). CONCLUSION: Adequate FHL tendon length could be harvested through a single posterior incision for fixation to the calcaneus with either fixation option, but suture anchor required significantly less graft length. Stiffness, fixation strength, and load to failure were comparable between groups. An inverse correlation existed between failure load and donor age. Younger specimens with screw fixation demonstrated significantly greater failure loads. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Adequate harvest length for FHL transfer could be achieved with a single posterior incision. There was no difference in strength of fixation between suture anchor and biotenodesis screw.

authors

  • Drakos, Mark C.
  • Gott, Michael
  • Karnovsky, Sydney C
  • Murphy, Conor I
  • DeSandis, Bridget A
  • Chinitz, Noah
  • Grande, Daniel
  • Chahine, Nadeen

publication date

  • May 2, 2017

Research

keywords

  • Bone Screws
  • Foot
  • Plastic Surgery Procedures
  • Suture Anchors
  • Tendon Injuries
  • Tendons
  • Tenodesis

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 85021924576

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1177/1071100717702848

PubMed ID

  • 28460573

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 38

issue

  • 7