Prevalence and correlates of receiving and sharing high-penetrance cancer genetic test results: findings from the Health Information National Trends Survey. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to explore the prevalence and correlates of receiving and sharing high-penetrance cancer genetic test results. METHODS: Participants completed the population-based, cross-sectional 2013 Health Information National Trends Survey. We examined sociodemographic characteristics of participants reporting having had BRCA1/2 or Lynch syndrome genetic testing, and sociodemographic and psychosocial correlates of sharing test results with health professionals and family members. RESULTS: Participants who underwent BRCA1/2 or Lynch syndrome genetic testing (n = 77; 2.42% of respondents) were more likely to be female and to have a family or personal history of cancer than those not undergoing testing. Approximately three-quarters of participants shared results with health professionals and three-quarters with their family; only 4% did not share results with anyone. Participants who shared results with health professionals reported greater optimism, self-efficacy for health management, and trust in information from their doctors. Participants who shared results with their family were more likely to be female and to have a personal history of cancer, and had greater self-efficacy for health management, perceived less ambiguity in cancer prevention recommendations, and lower cancer prevention fatalism. CONCLUSIONS: We identified several novel psychosocial correlates of sharing genetic information. Health professionals may use this information to identify patients less likely to share information with at-risk family members.

publication date

  • January 1, 2015

Research

keywords

  • Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis
  • Genetic Testing
  • Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome
  • Professional-Patient Relations

Identity

PubMed Central ID

  • PMC4405401

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 84924260780

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1159/000368745

PubMed ID

  • 25427996

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 18

issue

  • 2