Pain management after total knee arthroplasty using a multimodal approach. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • Improvements in pain management techniques over the past decade have had a significant impact on the outcomes of total knee arthroplasty. Of these techniques, multimodal approaches have shown potential. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of periarticular injection (PAI) to a combination of patient-controlled epidural analgesia and femoral nerve block (PCEA/FNB). Ninety patients undergoing primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty between June 2010 and March 2011 were randomized into 2 groups. The first group received the PCEA/FNB protocol, whereas the second group received the PAI. Mean patient age was 66.1 ± 8.7 years. All patients were operated on using a similar standard medial parapatellar approach, and all received preemptive analgesia and postoperative pain protocols. All patients were interviewed twice daily for the first 3 days postoperatively, once on day 7, and once in month 6. The 2 groups had similar readiness for discharge (PCEA/FNB group, 3.3 ± 1.2 days; PAI group, 3.2 ± 1.9 days). The results indicated no statistical difference between the 2 groups in 3 of 4 categories (rest in the morning, rest in the evening, and ambulation in the morning). Pain on ambulation was the only category that was statistically lower in the PCEA/FNB group than in the PAI group.Although the study demonstrates similar results between the 2 groups, PAI can play a major role in postoperative pain control in institutions that may not have appropriately trained individuals, equipment, and resources for PCEA/FNB. It also reduces many of the side effects and complications associated with regional anesthesia.

publication date

  • May 1, 2012

Research

keywords

  • Analgesia, Patient-Controlled
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
  • Nerve Block
  • Pain Management
  • Pain, Postoperative

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 84861487165

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.3928/01477447-20120426-19

PubMed ID

  • 22588407

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 35

issue

  • 5