What is the clinical utility of routine cardiac catheterization before a Fontan operation?
Academic Article
Overview
abstract
Patients with single-ventricle circulation presenting for Fontan completion routinely undergo cardiac catheterization despite ongoing debate concerning its additive value. Increasing interest in noninvasive preoperative evaluation alone led the authors to analyze the utility of routine pre-Fontan catheterization and to determine whether a subset of patients could avoid this invasive procedure. Patients younger than 5 years referred for pre-Fontan evaluation were retrospectively reviewed. Medical records and catheter angiograms were examined, and catheterizations were categorized as "additive" based on predetermined criteria. Associations between precatheterization variables, catheterization findings, and short-term postoperative outcomes were evaluated. Cardiac catheterization was clinically nonadditive for 89 of 175 patients undergoing pre-Fontan evaluation (51%). There were no robust precatheterization predictors of a nonadditive catheterization. Echocardiography did not fully demonstrate the relevant anatomy of 115 patients (66%), most frequently due to inadequate visualization of the pulmonary arteries, and 22 patients had additive catheterizations due to new diagnostic findings alone. Interventions at catheterization were frequent and deemed "important" for 64 patients (37%). Catheterization hemodynamic data were not associated with early postoperative outcomes. Minor catheterization complications occurred for 51 patients (29%) and major complications for 4 patients (2%). Although at least 50% of the patients presenting for Fontan completion may be able to avoid routine catheterization safely, an echocardiography-based imaging strategy alone is insufficient to allow proper identification of those who could be evaluated noninvasively. A more comprehensive imaging strategy not based solely on echocardiography should be considered.
