Alternative cancer cures: "Unproven" or "disproven"? Review uri icon

Overview

MeSH Major

  • Complementary Therapies
  • Neoplasms

abstract

  • Oncology has always coexisted with therapies offered outside of conventional cancer treatment centers and based on theories not found in biomedicine. These alternative cancer cures have often been described as "unproven," suggesting that appropriate clinical trials have not been conducted and that the therapeutic value of the treatment is unknown. Contrary to much popular and scientific writing, many alternative cancer treatments have been investigated in good quality clinical trials, and they have been shown to be ineffective. In this article, clinical trial data on a number of alternative cancer cures including Livingston-Wheeler, Di Bella Multitherapy, antineoplastons, vitamin C, hydrazine sulfate, Laetrile, and psychotherapy are reviewed. The label "unproven" is inappropriate for such therapies; it is time to assert that many alternative cancer therapies have been "disproven."

publication date

  • March 2004

Research

keywords

  • Review

Identity

Language

  • eng

PubMed ID

  • 15061600

Additional Document Info

start page

  • 110

end page

  • 8

volume

  • 54

number

  • 2