Fertilization after standard in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in subfertile males using sibling oocytes. Academic Article uri icon

Overview

abstract

  • OBJECTIVE: To compare conventional IVF with ICSI in the subfertile male population using sibling oocytes. Results from males with isolated severe teratozoospermia also are analyzed. DESIGN: Prospective experimental study. SETTING: University based IVF clinic. PATIENT(S): Group A: 18 patients with one or more abnormalities in count, motility, or morphology. Group B: 20 patients with isolated severe teratozoospermia (< or = 4% Kruger Strict Criteria). INTERVENTION(S): Ovulation induction, random allocation of sibling oocytes, and IVF or ICSI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Fertilization rates (fertilization per cycle, fertilization per oocytes, and fertilization per couple) and embryo quality. RESULT(S): In group A, fertilization occurred in 13 of 18 (72%) of IVF cycles and 17 of 18 (94%) of ICSI cycles. Overall, 69 of 120 (58%) oocytes fertilized after IVF, whereas 80 of 131 (61%) fertilized after ICSI. The mean (+/-SEM) percent of oocytes fertilized per couple was 44.6%+/-9.0% with IVF and 62.7%+/-5.6% with ICSI (not statistically significant). In group B, fertilization occurred in 18 of 20 (90%) cycles after IVF and 20 of 20 (100%) cycles with ICSI. Overall, 54 of 113 (48%) of the oocytes fertilized after IVF, whereas 82 of 124 (66%) fertilized with ICSI. The mean (+/-SEM) percent of oocytes fertilized per couple was 50.9%+/-7.1 % with IVF and 66.6%+/-4.7% with ICSI. No statistically significant difference in embryo quality after IVF versus ICSI was demonstrated. CONCLUSION(S): With severe teratozoospermia, ICSI results in higher fertilization rates than conventional IVF, without altering embryo quality. In our subfertile male population, there is a trend toward improved fertilization with ICSI, with less failed fertilization.

publication date

  • April 1, 1999

Research

keywords

  • Fertilization in Vitro
  • Infertility, Male

Identity

Scopus Document Identifier

  • 0033021517

PubMed ID

  • 10202870

Additional Document Info

volume

  • 71

issue

  • 4