Endovascular-assisted versus conventional in situ saphenous vein bypass grafting: Cumulative patency, limb salvage, and cost results in a 39-month multicenter study Academic Article uri icon

Overview

MeSH Major

  • Angioscopy
  • Arterial Occlusive Diseases
  • Atherectomy
  • Salvage Therapy
  • Saphenous Vein

abstract

  • The CISB and EISB midterm primary and secondary patency and limb salvage rates were statistically similar. In smaller veins (< 2.5 to 3.0 mm in diameter), however, EISB is not appropriate because overly aggressive instrumentation may cause intimal trauma, with resultant early graft failure. With the avoidance of a long leg incision in the EISB group, wound complications and hospital length of stay were significantly reduced, which lowered hospital charges and justified the additional cost of the endovascular instruments. When in situ bypass grafting is contemplated, EISB in appropriate patients is a safe, minimally invasive, and cost-effective alternative to CISB.

publication date

  • February 7, 2000

Research

keywords

  • Academic Article

Identity

Language

  • eng

PubMed ID

  • 10642709

Additional Document Info

start page

  • 60

end page

  • 8

volume

  • 31

number

  • 1 I