Resuscitation: How do we decide? A prospective study of physicians' preferences and the clinical course of hospitalized patients Academic Article Article uri icon


MeSH Major

  • DNA Replication
  • Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein
  • Fragile X Syndrome
  • Promoter Regions, Genetic
  • Replication Origin


  • A study was undertaken to identify the determinants of physicians' decisions about the treatment status of all patients admitted to the medical service of the New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center during a one-month period. It was found that the patient's age, prognosis, and functional status were the main factors considered in assigning "full" vs. "not-full" intervention. Within prognostically similar groups, there was no significant difference in mortality rates between "full" and "not-full" intervention patients. Except for admission to intensive care units the level of care was not lower for "not-full" intervention patients. The investigators conclude that, because most severely ill patients survive and patient participation in resuscitation decisions is psychologically stressful, the optimal strategy is to limit initiation of such discussions to those patients whose hospital course is marked by a steady deterioration.

publication date

  • June 3, 1986



  • Academic Article


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1001/jama.255.10.1316

PubMed ID

  • 3944949

Additional Document Info

start page

  • 1316

end page

  • 22


  • 255


  • 10